The Da Vinci Code Dâwt Sawi Hailanna- Part-2

Kâr kal tâ-ah khân Part-1 ah, Dan Brown-a Dâwt Sawi lian tak tak 7 kan hailang tawh a. Vawiinah Point 13 dang kan Chhunzawm leh dawn a ni. Dan Brown-a hian Lal Isua leh Bible te, kan Thurin leh Judate, Protestant Kristian-te leh Roman Catholic-te nasa takin a bei a, a suasam-in, a sawichhia a. Chuvangin, Kohhran-te leh Lal Isua ringtu tawh phawt chuan kan ngaihthah mai mai tur a ni lova, Brown-an Lal Isua leh Bible a Sawichhiatna Thawnthu Bu “The Da Vinci Code” etc. pawh hi kan hnualsuatin, kan ngaisâng lo ngam tur a ni.

Pathianin a huat leh a ten êm êm pakhat chu, “DÂWT” hi a ni (Thuf.6:17). Setana pawh “DÂWT-PA” tiin Bible-in a koh/vuah hial a (John 8:44). Vanram kai lo tur list-ah “Dâwt ngaina leh Dâwt hmang”-te hi an tel bawk (Thup.22:15). Dan Brown-a pawh hian a hriat-chian loh-te chu “ka hre chiang lo” ti mai se, an sawi a hriat-te pawh chu, “an sawi ka hriat mai a ni” ti mai ngam bawk sela chuan, a tih-sualna vak a awm lo tur. Hrechiang lutuk ang hrim leh thudik tak sawi ang maia, “all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate” tia a thuziak leh thulâkna hnâr a sawi rinawm tâ hian Dâwt a sawitir ta vak mai a ni, a pawi hle. A thui deuh hlek a, taima taka chhiar turin ka ngen a che u.

Thuvawn atâna kan neih reng tur chu – Tirhkoh Paul sawi angin, “Tuman ţawng kam thiamin an bum loh nân che u, chung chu ka ti a ni. Fimkhur rawh u, chutilochuan tupawhin Krista thu ang ni lovin, mihring thu rochhiah leh khawvel A Aw B ang zawkin an thu fing leh Bumna mai maiin râl lâkin an la dah ang che u” (Kol.2:4, 8), tih hi a ni.  

The Da Vinci Code, Angels & Demons and The Lost Symbol : 50 Factual Errors

Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code and The Lost Symbol, says that his books, while fictional, are grounded in fact. We look at 50 of his claims.

The Da Vinci Code, his previous bestseller, began in a similar fashion, "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate", Brown says before the prologue.

So is that true? We take a look at 50 of Brown's more contentious points in the two novels and a third, Angels and Demons, his previous work also starring Harvard Symbologist Robert Langdon. This represents our best attempt to find the facts behind Brown's stories. If you disagree with any of them, or if you have any more information, please add your thoughts in the comment box below. 

Some are major, some are minor. They are divided, somewhat arbitrarily, into categories of "History", "Geography", "Science", "Symbols, Religion and Mythology", "Language" and "Miscellany".

The Da Vinci Code Dâwt Sawi Hailanna - Part-1

THUHMAHRUAI

Lal Isua’n “Êng fate aiin he khawvêl fate hi an tûnlai kawngah chuan an fing zawk” (Lk.16:8) tia a lo sawi tawh angin, he Dan Brown-a Ngaihruat Lasi Thawnthu Phuahchawp “The Da Vinci Code” hi Kum 2003 khân chhuah (published) a ni chauhva, tunah hian khawvelah 40 million copies an hralh dêr tawh a, ţawng hrang 40 chuangin an letling tawh. Lal Isua ringlote hian Lal Isua chanchin a chhe thei ang bera ziakna thehdarh leh sawidarh dân chu an thiam hle tih a lang chiang khawp mai.

Dan Brown-a hi Zirna lamah chuan graduate ve hrâm a ni. A Thawnthu Bu ziaknaah hian Research pakhat mah nei lova The Da Vinci Code kha ziak a nihzia May 25, 2003 khân CNN hmaa interview-naah a sawi chhuak a. Kum 2006 khân The Da Vinci Code chu Mi ziak-tawh-sa ama ziak niawm taka a insawi avangin “Plagarism Case”-in Court-ah an khing a. Chuta a inpuanna chu, “Hun ka neih tam loh avangin The Da Vinci Code pawh hi ka la chhiar-chhuak lo hrim hrim a. Ka nupui Blythe Brown ziak a tam zawk a. Email-in a kaih-tawi (summary) min rawn thawn ve ţhin chauh zawk a ni” a ti ta a nih kha!!!  

The Da Vinci Code - 104 List of Errors & Facts

A Chapter-by-Chapter guide to what's true, what's false, and what might be true in The Da Vinci Code. Click links for references and further information. The claims of the book are listed in the order in which they appear. The list isn't completely exhaustive, but covers virtually all claims of interest.

The Last Supper was thoroughly restored in 1954, revealing more details. 

The Lost Gospel, The Last Temptation Of Christ & The Da Vinci Code-Te Dâwt Sawi Hailanna

Thuhmahruai

The Lost Gospel (Fiction written around 500 A.D.), leh The Last Temptation of Christ (Adapted from the Lost Gospel Fiction written by Nikos Kazantzakis & Film Director Martin Scorses), leh The Da Vinci Code (Fiction written by Dan Brown) te hi Ngaihruat Lasi Thawnthu Phuahchawp leh Zirtirna Dik Lo (Fiction & Heretical Teachings) an ni a, Lal Isua leh Kristianna Dotute an ni. An Thu kalpui dân & Suk-thlek dân (Theology) leh Thiltum (Motives) a In-ang vek. Dâwt-thu leh Rinthu bâk sawi tur an nei lova, Thu Belhchian dawl lo leh Chhui-chian dawl lo thu an theh-darh a ni, tih i hria ang u. 

He Thu Dik Lo leh Zirtirna Dik Lo hi Prof. Barrie Wilson leh Writer Simcha Jacobovic-te chuan, British Library thir pindan (vaults) chhunga kutziak lehkha (manuscript), hlui tawh tak kum 1500 vel zeta upa chu British Library-ah hmu-in, Thudik ang takin an Thehdarh a, Lal Isua kha Mary Magdalene-i nen inneiin Fa 2 (4?) an nei a, Nula Thianghlim Mary kha Isua nu ni lovin a nupui zawk a ni, an ti a ni.

Proof or Evidence Ţha tak Supporter Pakhat mah an nei lo. Kristianna (Christianity) leh Lal Isua Sawichhiatna atâna Ngaihruat Lasi Thawnthu Phuahchawp (Fiction/Fairy Tale) a ni a, Legend pawh a ni pha lo, tih i hre reng bawk ang u. The Lost Gospel leh The Temptation of Christ leh The Da Vinci Code te hi Unau Pianghmun, Chhul-khat chhuak an ni a, an Thu-vuak thlak chu a in-ang vek a, Lal Isua leh Kristianna Dona a ni. A hnuaiah hian an Thu-ken leh Zirtirna-te tlêm a zawng ka rawn tarlang e:-

The Last Temptation of Christ Denied (The Lost Gospel/The Da Vinci Code)

Note from Webamateur: This is the text of a book produced at the time of the release of Martin Scorsese film, "The Last Temptation Of Christ." By the time the book was written, the controversy regarding the film had died down, so the publisher decided not to publish the book. The footnotes are missing from this online edition. I hope to restore them at some time in the future. I have, however, left in what would have been the index for your reading enjoyment.

Introduction

Battle lines have been drawn between the fanatical fundamentalists and the blasphemous secular humanists. The Last Temptation of Christ is the gauntlet, thrown by the secular entertainment industry, and kicked back by the pious clerical community. Nobody is willing to give an inch now, and with charges of heresy and counter-charges of censorship, both sides are characterized as bigoted troublemakers.

What happened? How could things get this bad? Who's wrong? Is anybody right? And most importantly, what does The Last Temptation of Christ say about our Christianity and our society?

The Last Temptation of Christ is not an anomaly. It is a symptom of disease in both the Church and secular society. What is unusual is the amount of publicity generated around the fervency of Christian protest and the adamant refusal of Universal to respect religious belief.

The Real Reason Behind the Film "The Last Temptation of Christ"

Dear Christian Friend: The controversy about the film, "The Last Temptation of Christ" has promoted speculation concerning the motive behind this blasphemy. The usual answer is that a "non-Christian group of film makers" is defying Christian America, because of greed. Consider These Facts: Although the original author of "The Last Temptation of Christ," Nikos Kazanitsakis, was Greek, the two most powerful figures behind this movie, Lew Wasserman, president of MCA (owner of Universal Studios, which produced the film) and Sidney Sheinberg, president of MCA, are Jewish. Gary Goldstein, head of national promotion and field operations for MCA, is also Jewish. Does such Jewish promotion of this anti-Christian film imply a "Jewish conspiracy" to defame Christ?

Mary Magdalene in The Last Temptation of Christ (The Lost Gospel/The Da Vinci Code)

In The Last Temptation of Christ (1988), Martin Scorsese tells a controversial story of a Jesus (played by Willem Dafoe) who struggles to follow his destiny: is he fully God or fully human? His companion Mary Magdalene wants him to “be a real man.”

Scorsese creates a character out of several unrelated biblical women, relying more on the novel by Kazantzakis than on historical research about Mary Magdalene.

1. For example, he draws on the Samaritan woman who has multiple husbands (John 4) and presents Mary as prostitute who is naked, unveiled, and

2. Mary was Covered with Tattoos,

3. Having sex with a series of men while others, including Jesus, watch;

4. She has become a Prostitute because Jesus refused to marry her.

A Wedding That Will Move You - Rowden & Leizel

'It was like a heartbreaking fairytale': Emotional moment cancer patient weds his true love in hospital ceremony before dying just 10 hours later

A 29-year-old cancer patient married the love of his life in an emotional ceremony at a Philippines hospital, just hours before dying.

Rowden Go Pangcoga had been busy planning his dream wedding to Leizl for July, when stage 4 liver cancer was diagnosed in May.

A video that captured the beautiful and heartbreaking ceremony earlier this month has quickly gone viral, with more than 4 million views since it was uploaded on June 18.

The wedding video was put on YouTube by Rowden's brother Hasset Go, who thanked staff at the Manila hospital for helping the family perform the wedding.

Hasset said his brother's dying wish had been to marry Leizl and, 'after 12 hours of preparations, his dream was fulfilled'.

Anti-Christ: Its Origin, Nationality, Character, Career, & Global Conquest

1. Introduction

Biblical Prophecies clearly predict the rise of the Anti-Christ in the end times and more than 100 passages of Scripture describe the Anti-Christ’s Origin, Nationality, Character, Career, and Global Conquest. The term Anti-Christ may be applied both to an individual and to the system he represents.

Interestingly, the term Antichrist (Anti-Christos in the Greek) appears only in 1John 2:18-22, 4:3, 2John 7. The Apostle John uses it both in the Singular (the antichrist) and in the Plural (many anti-Christ). John indicates that his readers have already heard that the Antichrist is coming in the future. Then he surprises them by announcing that many antichrists have already come. He describes these lesser antichrists as liars who deny that Jesus is the Christ (2:22).

In this sense, an Antichrist is any False Teacher who denies the person and work of Jesus Christ. Such Teachers are truly anti (against) Christ. In 1John 4:1-3, John warns us to test the spirits to make sure they are from God. He warns that many false prophets (pseudo-prophetes in the Greek) have “gone out into the world.” These are the people who do not acknowledge that Jesus is from God. In this sense, John announces that the “spirit of the antichrist… is already in the world.”

Doctor of Divinity (Honorary Doctorate) Hi Hmingbula Dah Chi A Ni Em?

Kan Reverend/Doctor te Bihchianna

By Rev. Dr. L.R. Colney, Founder/President, Restoration India Mission, Odisha.

Mizo Christianna in Kum 100 hmel kan hmuh  ve meuh chuan, Pathian thu zir mi mithiam kan ngah ve ta hle mai. Duhsakna Degree (Honorary)  dawng pawh kan ngah ta hle mai bawk. A lawmawm viau lai hian tlem chu kan zir chian aţhat a rinawm ta.

Mizo zinga Honorary Doctorate degree nei te hian hmingbul (Formal Title) ah an dah deuh vek mai a. Zirchhuakte nen mipui te tan hriat hran an har ta hle mai. He ti nuai nuai a kan kal chuan a dik dawn leh pek lo. Rev. Dr. kan ngah tulh tulh anga kohhran hi a ho tulh tulh mai ang tih te pawh a hlauhawm ta.

Keini (Misual) Ho Bawk Hian Ching Chhuak Leh Teh Ang U

Honorary Degree kan tih mai hi Latin tawng HONORIS CAUSA atanga lokal a ni. Mi chung chuang bik khawtlang leh ram tan a contribution tha chungchuang te tan a ni. Chu mi ah chuan an hnathawh a field adang ang angin chawimawina an hlan dan pawh a dang thin. A tlangpui thuin heng ang degree hi hlan ani tlangpui.

The Shroud of Turin And Its Significance For Biblical Studies

Introduction (Abstract):

This essay addresses the four areas most commonly questioned in a study of the Shroud of Turin: its history, its relationship with the NT descriptions of Jewish burial techniques, correlations with the person of Jesus, and any possible evidence for his resurrection. Evangelical critics usually concentrate on the NT data related to Jesus’ burial: the author therefore gives special attention to this area.

There is little question that the Shroud of Turin has occasioned much recent interest in evangelical and non-evangelical circles alike. My own interest in this subject was aroused years ago by my studies on the apologetic value of Jesus’ resurrection. Because of these studies it has been my privilege both to do research with some of the scientists who investigated the shroud in October 1978 and to have recently co-authored a manuscript along with the official spokesman for these scientists. My chief area of research has been the philosophical questions surrounding the shroud and any possible evidence for the resurrection of Jesus in particular.

These opportunities have given me a different perspective from which to view the Shroud. Most reports concerning the scientific investigation have been based on news releases and on other incomplete (and often incorrect) data. As a result many articles have appeared, both pro and con, but based on these or other more superficial sources. Especially distressing are some evangelical critiques based on partial information. The major reason why such reports are based on largely incomplete data is simply stated: The final report of the scientists and much of the other material has not been released yet. One cannot refute what one does not know. But the most crucial data concerning the research has not been made public and therefore such critiques are quite incomplete.

Lal Isua Dik Lo Taka Thiamloh Chantir A Ni

1. Thuhmahruai

Bible Scholar-ten an chhût dânin, Lal Isua chungthu ngaihtuah a nih chhung hi darkâr 8 aiin a tam thei lo niin an ngai a. Juda rorel pawl Sanhedrin-in misual (thihna khawpa sual ti) an man chungthu chu ni 2 chhung tal ţawngţaina nen an ngaihtuah tur a nih laiin, Lal Isua chungthu erawhchu ni 1 pawh tling lovah rorelna an zo fel vek a, an tihlum hman der tawh thung a ni.

Tin, Lal Isua thiamloh an chantir theihna tura ro an relsak dân zawng zawng te kha Juda dân leh Sanhedrin dân dinglai kalh vek a ni bawk. Tin, Puithiam Lalber hnena hruai a nih hmâ-in, Ana (Puithiam Lalber hlui) hnenah hruai hmasak phawt a ni a (John 18:12-24), hei hian awmzia a nei hle. Puithiam Lalber nilai mêk Kaiapha aia ngaih pawimawh zawk an nei tih a chiang bawk. Mahse, hei pawh hian an rorelna fair lohzia a târlang tel leh bawk a ni.

Lal Isua khân rorelna chi 2– Judate (sakhaw lam) leh Rom (Sorkar/khawvel lam) rorelna a hmachhawn ve ve a. Thil mak tak chu, Khawvel Court (Rom Sorkar/Pilata) chuan Lal Isua kha a sualna a hmuh loh avangin thiam a chantir a, Sakhaw Court (Juda Puithiamte/Sanhedrin) chuan a sualna an hmu lo chungin thiam loh an chantir ta thung a ni!!! Sanhedrin-te hian mi tihhlum theihna dân an neih si loh avangin (John 18:31) Rom Sorkar remtihna leh pawmpuina hmangin Lal Isua chu tihhlum turin an buatsaih ta a. Rom Sorkar tân chuan Juda mi, anmahni ngeiin tihhlum an remtih chu thil lawmawm tawpkhawk a ni mai a, a chhan chu Juda mihring an tlêm poh leh Rom Sorkar tân chuan thunun an awl ting mai dawn a ni.

Tichuan, Juda sakhaw dân phuahchawp leh Rom sorkar dân ţangrual leh Mob-rule hmangin, a sualna hmu si lovin, “Circumstantial Evidence” ringawt hmangin Lal Isua, Mifel, Sualna nei lo kha thiamloh an chantir a, Kross-ah an khengbet a, an tihlum ta a ni!!!